Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 5, 2024
Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 30 of 30
Last Updated: 01/27/25 3:28 PM
Voters Registered at 7AM: 5,974
Results for Constitutional Amendments
Determining passage of a Constitutional Amendment requires knowledge of the total number of voters casting ballots. This number is estimated by using the votes for U.S. President as a key race, and is replaced by actual precinct statistics when they become available.| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics. |
| Yes | Actual YES votes cast |
| No | Actual NO votes cast |
| Estimated Blanks | Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage |
| *An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment. | |
Results by Municipality for Yellow Medicine County |
|
| CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 1 Show Question | |
| Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Renewal | |
| Burton Twp | |
| Yes | 38 |
| No | 51 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 90 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 42.22% |
| Canby | |
| Yes | 634 |
| No | 189 |
| Estimated Blanks | 50 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 873 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.62% |
| Clarkfield | |
| Yes | 264 |
| No | 105 |
| Estimated Blanks | 23 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 392 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 67.35% |
| Echo | |
| Yes | 88 |
| No | 35 |
| Estimated Blanks | 3 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 126 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 69.84% |
| Echo Twp | |
| Yes | 41 |
| No | 44 |
| Estimated Blanks | 4 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 89 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 46.07% |
| Florida Twp | |
| Yes | 42 |
| No | 25 |
| Estimated Blanks | 4 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 71 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 59.15% |
| Fortier Twp | |
| Yes | 22 |
| No | 28 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 55 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 40.00% |
| Friendship Twp | |
| Yes | 64 |
| No | 52 |
| Estimated Blanks | 7 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 123 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 52.03% |
| Granite Falls | |
| Yes | 1,071 |
| No | 362 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 979 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.88% |
| Hammer Twp | |
| Yes | 65 |
| No | 52 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 118 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 55.08% |
| Hanley Falls | |
| Yes | 72 |
| No | 19 |
| Estimated Blanks | 6 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 97 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 74.23% |
| Hazel Run | |
| Yes | 16 |
| No | 3 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 19 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 84.21% |
| Hazel Run Twp | |
| Yes | 60 |
| No | 62 |
| Estimated Blanks | 3 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 125 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 48.00% |
| Lisbon Twp | |
| Yes | 65 |
| No | 42 |
| Estimated Blanks | 10 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 117 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 55.56% |
| Minnesota Falls Twp | |
| Yes | 135 |
| No | 71 |
| Estimated Blanks | 11 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 217 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 62.21% |
| Norman Twp | |
| Yes | 77 |
| No | 77 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 159 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 48.43% |
| Normania Twp | |
| Yes | 63 |
| No | 43 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 111 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 56.76% |
| Omro Twp | |
| Yes | 32 |
| No | 38 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 72 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 44.44% |
| Oshkosh Twp | |
| Yes | 72 |
| No | 63 |
| Estimated Blanks | 4 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 139 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 51.80% |
| Porter | |
| Yes | 71 |
| No | 15 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 91 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 78.02% |
| Posen Twp | |
| Yes | 75 |
| No | 60 |
| Estimated Blanks | 9 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 144 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 52.08% |
| Sandnes Twp | |
| Yes | 90 |
| No | 49 |
| Estimated Blanks | 6 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 145 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 62.07% |
| Sioux Agency Twp | |
| Yes | 75 |
| No | 69 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 146 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 51.37% |
| St. Leo | |
| Yes | 26 |
| No | 13 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 40 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 65.00% |
| Stony Run Twp | |
| Yes | 168 |
| No | 99 |
| Estimated Blanks | 9 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 276 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 60.87% |
| Swede Prairie Twp | |
| Yes | 48 |
| No | 30 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 83 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 57.83% |
| Tyro Twp | |
| Yes | 51 |
| No | 40 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 96 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 53.13% |
| Wergeland Twp | |
| Yes | 53 |
| No | 42 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 100 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 53.00% |
| Wood Lake | |
| Yes | 128 |
| No | 71 |
| Estimated Blanks | 4 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 203 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 63.05% |
| Wood Lake Twp | |
| Yes | 83 |
| No | 51 |
| Estimated Blanks | 9 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 143 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 58.04% |