Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Results Home

Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 37 of 37

Last Updated: 01/27/25 3:28 PM

Voters Registered at 7AM: 12,287

Results for Constitutional Amendments

Determining passage of a Constitutional Amendment requires knowledge of the total number of voters casting ballots. This number is estimated by using the votes for U.S. President as a key race, and is replaced by actual precinct statistics when they become available.

Value	Definition
Estimated Total Number of Voters	Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics.
Yes	Actual YES votes cast
No	Actual NO votes cast
Estimated Blanks	Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes
Estimated Percent of YES*	YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage
*An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment.

Results by Precinct for Martin County
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 1 Show Question
Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Renewal
Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to protect drinking water sources and the water quality of lakes, rivers, and streams; conserve wildlife habitat and natural areas; improve air quality; and expand access to parks and trails by extending the transfer of proceeds from the state-operated lottery to the environment and natural resources trust fund, and to dedicate the proceeds for these purposes?
CEDAR TWP.
Yes	76
No	54
Estimated Blanks	13
Estimated Total Number of Voters	143
Estimated Percent of YES*	53.15%

CENTER CREEK TWP.
Yes	81
No	35
Estimated Blanks	8
Estimated Total Number of Voters	124
Estimated Percent of YES*	65.32%

CEYLON
Yes	108
No	34
Estimated Blanks	17
Estimated Total Number of Voters	159
Estimated Percent of YES*	67.92%

DUNNELL
Yes	60
No	15
Estimated Blanks	7
Estimated Total Number of Voters	82
Estimated Percent of YES*	73.17%

EAST CHAIN TWP.
Yes	86
No	72
Estimated Blanks	9
Estimated Total Number of Voters	167
Estimated Percent of YES*	51.50%

ELM CREEK TWP.
Yes	56
No	58
Estimated Blanks	3
Estimated Total Number of Voters	117
Estimated Percent of YES*	47.86%

FAIRMONT TWP.
Yes	114
No	53
Estimated Blanks	19
Estimated Total Number of Voters	186
Estimated Percent of YES*	61.29%

FAIRMONT W-1 P-1
Yes	459
No	152
Estimated Blanks	19
Estimated Total Number of Voters	630
Estimated Percent of YES*	72.86%

FAIRMONT W-1 P-2
Yes	646
No	194
Estimated Blanks	37
Estimated Total Number of Voters	877
Estimated Percent of YES*	73.66%

FAIRMONT W-2 P-1
Yes	485
No	140
Estimated Blanks	32
Estimated Total Number of Voters	657
Estimated Percent of YES*	73.82%

FAIRMONT W-2 P-2
Yes	601
No	198
Estimated Blanks	39
Estimated Total Number of Voters	838
Estimated Percent of YES*	71.72%

FAIRMONT W-3 P-1
Yes	382
No	95
Estimated Blanks	19
Estimated Total Number of Voters	496
Estimated Percent of YES*	77.02%

FAIRMONT W-3 P-2
Yes	429
No	93
Estimated Blanks	35
Estimated Total Number of Voters	557
Estimated Percent of YES*	77.02%

FAIRMONT W-4 P-1
Yes	397
No	136
Estimated Blanks	22
Estimated Total Number of Voters	555
Estimated Percent of YES*	71.53%

FAIRMONT W-4 P-2
Yes	380
No	111
Estimated Blanks	33
Estimated Total Number of Voters	524
Estimated Percent of YES*	72.52%

FOX LAKE TWP.
Yes	95
No	85
Estimated Blanks	3
Estimated Total Number of Voters	183
Estimated Percent of YES*	51.91%

FRASER TWP.
Yes	99
No	51
Estimated Blanks	10
Estimated Total Number of Voters	160
Estimated Percent of YES*	61.88%

GALENA TWP.
Yes	76
No	54
Estimated Blanks	3
Estimated Total Number of Voters	133
Estimated Percent of YES*	57.14%

GRANADA
Yes	92
No	48
Estimated Blanks	14
Estimated Total Number of Voters	154
Estimated Percent of YES*	59.74%

JAY TWP.
Yes	87
No	73
Estimated Blanks	14
Estimated Total Number of Voters	174
Estimated Percent of YES*	50.00%

LAKE BELT TWP.
Yes	55
No	51
Estimated Blanks	6
Estimated Total Number of Voters	112
Estimated Percent of YES*	49.11%

LAKE FREMONT TWP.
Yes	49
No	39
Estimated Blanks	7
Estimated Total Number of Voters	95
Estimated Percent of YES*	51.58%

MANYASKA TWP.
Yes	122
No	86
Estimated Blanks	8
Estimated Total Number of Voters	216
Estimated Percent of YES*	56.48%

NASHVILLE TWP.
Yes	76
No	42
Estimated Blanks	12
Estimated Total Number of Voters	130
Estimated Percent of YES*	58.46%

NORTHROP
Yes	97
No	22
Estimated Blanks	9
Estimated Total Number of Voters	128
Estimated Percent of YES*	75.78%

ORMSBY
Yes	26
No	4
Estimated Blanks	1
Estimated Total Number of Voters	31
Estimated Percent of YES*	83.87%

PLEASANT PRAIRIE TWP.
Yes	90
No	51
Estimated Blanks	16
Estimated Total Number of Voters	157
Estimated Percent of YES*	57.32%

ROLLING GREEN TWP.
Yes	71
No	61
Estimated Blanks	14
Estimated Total Number of Voters	146
Estimated Percent of YES*	48.63%

RUTLAND TWP.
Yes	149
No	95
Estimated Blanks	7
Estimated Total Number of Voters	251
Estimated Percent of YES*	59.36%

SHERBURN
Yes	392
No	160
Estimated Blanks	42
Estimated Total Number of Voters	594
Estimated Percent of YES*	65.99%

SILVER LAKE TWP.
Yes	189
No	106
Estimated Blanks	15
Estimated Total Number of Voters	310
Estimated Percent of YES*	60.97%

TENHASSEN TWP.
Yes	87
No	44
Estimated Blanks	8
Estimated Total Number of Voters	139
Estimated Percent of YES*	62.59%

TRIMONT
Yes	250
No	106
Estimated Blanks	26
Estimated Total Number of Voters	382
Estimated Percent of YES*	65.45%

TRUMAN
Yes	406
No	123
Estimated Blanks	29
Estimated Total Number of Voters	558
Estimated Percent of YES*	72.76%

WAVERLY TWP.
Yes	59
No	52
Estimated Blanks	9
Estimated Total Number of Voters	120
Estimated Percent of YES*	49.17%

WELCOME
Yes	261
No	113
Estimated Blanks	25
Estimated Total Number of Voters	399
Estimated Percent of YES*	65.41%

WESTFORD TWP.
Yes	87
No	69
Estimated Blanks	8
Estimated Total Number of Voters	164
Estimated Percent of YES*	53.05%

Results State Results by Congressional District Results by Legislative District Results by County

Results for Constitutional Amendments

Results by Precinct for Martin County